Bio-genetic analysis of resistance in tomato to early blight disease, Alternaria alternata Author Alizadeh-Moghaddam, Giti ** & Department of Biology, Falavarjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, 84517 - 31167, Iran Author Rezayatmand, Zahra Author Esfahani, Mehdi Nasr- Author Khozaei, Mahdi text Phytochemistry 2020 112486 2020-11-30 179 1 11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112486 journal article 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112486 1873-3700 8293344

Table 3 Genetic variation detected through ISSR markers among 5 groups of tomato genotypes including: Susceptibility Groups of genotypes, Sample Size, % Polymorphic, Band Frequency, Number of Alleles, Effective Number of Allele, Shannon’ s information index, Expected Heterozygosity and Unbiased Expected Heterozygosity.

Susceptibility	Sample	Polymorphic	Band	Number of	Effective Number	Shannon’ s	Expected	Unbiased Expected
a G = highly susceptible group (CH American, Hyb. Retinto, Izmir, Ameera RZ, Hedieh, Super Crystal, Hyb. Sogno); G2 = susceptible group (111 Falat, Santawest Hyb., Supermobile, Shiraz local, Chief, Super Chief American, CH), G3 = moderately susceptible group (Hyb. Prolico, Hyb. Ventero, Chief Falat, Caribo, Hyb. Cherry., Hyb. Belize., Granisum Romani, Long Tomato Y, Hyb.SV 1201., H. a.s 2194); G4 = moderately resistant group (Roma, Falat American 111, Rayosol RZ, Italian Round, Arya Netherlands, Valouro RZ, Sakhia), G5 = resistant group (H.a.s 2274, Turkish Cherry, Rio Grande, Esfahan local).
Groups	Size	(%)	Frequen a y	Alleles	of Allele (Ne)	information index	Heterozygosity (He)	Heterozygosity (uHe)
						(I)
Group1 (G1 a)	7	60.29	0.36	1.29	1.34	0.30	0.20	0.22
Group2 (G2)	7	66.18	0.35	1.43	1.33	0.31	0.20	0.21
Group3 (G3)	10	67.65	0.32	1.41	1.33	0a30	0.20	0.21
Group4 (G4)	7	68.12	0.29	1.41	1.32	0.31	0.20	0.21
Group5 (G5)	4	36.76	0.28	0.85	1.21	0.19	0.13	0.14
Total Mean	7	59.80	0.32	1.28	1.30	0.28	0.18	0.20