Sensitivity to salinity at the emergence and seedling stages of barnyardgrass (EchinochloQ crus-gQlli), weedy rice (OryzQ sQtivQ), and rice with different tolerances to ALS-inhibiting herbicides Author Fogliatto, Silvia Postdoc Fellow, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, Author Patrucco, Lorenzo Postgraduate Fellow, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università degli Studi di Author Milan, Marco Postdoc Fellow, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, Author Vidotto, Francesco Associate Professor, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, text Weed Science 2021 Cambridge, England 2020-10-12 69 1 39 51 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2020.72 journal article 298657 10.1017/wsc.2020.72 f11a544c-edfb-4ceb-8f04-b1cee3d7a0ad 1550-2759 11553267

Table 1. Curve parameter (Equation 1) and sensitivity index (SI) (Equation 2) comparison between Echinochloa spp. populations (estimate and P-values).

	Parameter b comparison		Parameter d comparison		Parameter e comparison		SI
*Significant comparisons at P ≤ 0.05.
Population comparison	Estimate	P-value	Estimate	P-value	Estimate	P-value	Estimate	P-value
s1/s2 s1/s3 s1/r1 s1/r2 s2/s3 s2/r1 s2/r2 s3/r1 s3/r2 r1/r2	1.28 1.72 0.49 0.54 1.34 0.38 0.42 0.28 0.31 1.10	0.772 0.649 0.184 0.350 0.726 0.003* 0.050* 0.001* 0.014* 0.898	0.62 0.96 0.82 1.49 1.55 1.33 2.40 0.85 1.55 1.81	0.000* 0.843 0.165 0.130 0.034* 0.049* 0.004* 0.310 0.121 0.027*	1.29 1.01 1.46 2.31 0.79 1.13 1.80 1.43 2.28 1.59	0.581 0.977 0.387 0.177 0.641 0.623 0.162 0.577 0.337 0.151	1.29 1.02 0.68 0.43 0.79 0.88 0.56 0.69 0.44 1.59	0.581 0.977 0.207 0.002* 0.641 0.577 0.013* 0.424 0.031* 0.151