Validity of Ips chinensis Kurentzov & Kononov confirmed with DNA data
Author
Knížek, Milos
Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Jíloviště, Czechia
Author
Cognato, Anthony I.
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, USA Corresponding author, E-mail: cognato @ msu. edu
text
Zoological Systematics
2017
42
2
229
235
http://zoobank.org/4a1b1e1e-e7cc-4b03-a626-ddb031acc92b
journal article
4161
10.11865/zs.201712
987621b4-c823-484c-9346-9e218e86b26b
2095-6827
4617647
4A1B1E1E-E7CC-4B03-A626-DDB031ACC92B
Table 2. Mean (range) pairwise sequence differences measured as uncorrected "p".| Interclade | I. acuminatus | Clade A | Clade B |
|---|
| I. acuminatus | x | | |
|---|
| I. chinensis | 0.096 (0.073–0.120) | NA | NA |
|---|
| Clade A | 0.088 (0.073–0.096) | x | |
|---|
| Clade B | 0.100 (0.086–0.120) | 0.084 (0.071–0.094) | x |
|---|
| Intraclade | Mean | Range | |
|---|
| I. acuminatus | 0.025 | 0.000–0.049 | |
|---|
| I. chinensis | 0.013 | 0.003–0.037 | |
|---|
| Clade A | 0.018 | 0.005–0.037 | |
|---|
| Clade B | 0.009 | 0.003–0.017 | |
|---|